Now assume that is cubic. The previous method no longer works. Indeed, if we have a point
and draw a line of slope
, then equation
which we need to solve to find the points of intersection of the line with the curve will be cubic:
After factoring out , we are left with a quadratic equation, whose roots need not lie in
.
L. J. Mordell came up with the following way to salvage this method. Suppose that we know of two points Then the line
through
and
has slope
so we can apply the above method. But this time we know of two roots of the equation resulting from substitution of the equation of
into the equation for
Since the sum of solutions
, the third solution
also lies in
.
There are many “degenerate” cases of the above procedure. For example, a similar process can be followed if by using the equation of the line tangent to
at
The slope of that line will also lie in
The immediate purpose of this class is to organize the above procedure into a consistent method, which can then be used to systematically find all solutions to cubic equations.
Example. Let be the curve defined by
. It contains two points:
and
. The line through them has slope
and equation
. Plug that into the equation of the curve to get
which simplifies to
Notice that we don’t really care what the other terms in that equation are. We conclude that and therefore,
Finally,
Thus, the third point of intersection of the line through
and
is
We denote this point by
Note that since the curve is symmetric with respect to the x-axis, the reflection of
with respect to the x-axis will also have rational coordinates.
Bibliography:
[1] Mordell, L. J. “On the Rational Solutions of the Indeterminate Equations of the Third and Fourth Degrees.” Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 21, 179-192, 1922-23.