One of the interesting things to observe is what multiplication by does to
-adic integers:
But what matters is the congruence class of the components modulo and
so
Iterating gives us
This is, of course, a lot easier when using the series notation.
So, we can tell that divides
precisely when the first
components of
are zero. As a corollary, we obtain that if
, then there exist a largest
such that
divides
(i.e.,
does not divide
). This
is precisely the number of the initial components of
that are congruent to zero in their respective
Definition. The number as above is called the
-adic valuation of
and is denoted by
:
We set
The -adic valuation function satisfies the following properties:
if and only if
and
The last property is referred to as the ultrametric property for reasons to be explained right now.
Given any number (customarily,
), we can define
.
Then the properties of become
In other words, is an ultrametric norm. We can also define a metric
which makes into an utrametric space. The topology (convergence of sequences) induced by this norm does not change if we choose a different
, so from now on,
. Then
In other words, the higher power of divides you, the smaller you are.
Note that this norm can be restricted to the rational integers contained in
. The ring of integers is not complete under this norm, and therefore we can consider its completion, i.e., the smallest complete normed space containing
. Then the standard construction of the completion coincides for the
-adic norm with the construction of
-adic integers as sequences. Specifically, the condition that
translates into the Cauchy criterion
as
for sequences.
In light of this norm, the series notation also starts to make sense. Indeed, the truncated series form a Cauchy sequence, since has norm no greater than
, which goes to zero as
goes off to infinity. Thus the infinite series we work with converge with respect to the ultrametric
-adic norm.
Tags: p-adic