Topological construction of p-adic integers

By ellipticcurves

One of the interesting things to observe is what multiplication by p does to p-adic integers:

p(u_1, u_2, u_3, \ldots) = (p u_1, p u_2, p u_3, \ldots).

But what matters is the congruence class of the components modulo p^r, and pu_1 \equiv 0 \pmod p, pu_{r}\equiv pu_{r-1} \pmod{p^r}, so

p(u_1, u_2, u_3, \ldots) = (0, p u_1, p u_2, \ldots).

Iterating gives us

p^n (u_1, u_2, u_3, \ldots) = (\underbrace{0, \ldots, 0}_{n\text{ times}}, p^n u_1, p^n u_2, \ldots).

This is, of course, a lot easier when using the series notation.

So, we can tell that p^n divides u precisely when the first n components of u are zero. As a corollary, we obtain that if u\neq 0, then there exist a largest n such that p^n divides u (i.e., p^{n+1} does not divide u). This n is precisely the number of the initial components of u that are congruent to zero in their respective {\mathbb Z}/p^r{\mathbb Z}.

Definition. The number n as above is called the p-adic valuation of u, and is denoted by \mathrm{ord}_p(u):

\mathrm{ord}_p(u) := \mathrm{max}\{n\in {\mathbb N} | p^n\text{ divides }u\text{ in }{\mathbb Z}_p \}.

We set \mathrm{ord}_p(0) = \infty.

The p-adic valuation function satisfies the following properties:

  • \mathrm{ord}_p(u) = \infty if and only if u=0,
  • \mathrm{ord}_p(uv) = \mathrm{ord}_p(u)\mathrm{ord}_p(v), and
  • \mathrm{ord}_p(u+v) \geq \mathrm{min}(\mathrm{ord}_p(u), \mathrm{ord}_p(v)).

The last property is referred to as the ultrametric property for reasons to be explained right now.

Given any number 0 < \sigma < 1 (customarily, \sigma = 1/p), we can define

|u|_p := \sigma^{\mathrm{ord}_p(u)}.

Then the properties of \mathrm{ord}_p become

  • |u|_p \geq 0 for all u, with |u|_p = 0 if and only if u=0,
  • |uv|_p = |u|_p\, |v|_p, and
  • |u+v|_p \leq \mathrm{max}(|u|_p, |v|_p).
  • In other words, |\bullet|_p: {\mathbb Z}_p \to {\mathbb R} is an ultrametric norm. We can also define a metric

    d_p(u,v) := |u-v|_p,

    which makes {\mathbb Z}_p into an utrametric space. The topology (convergence of sequences) induced by this norm does not change if we choose a different \sigma, so from now on, \sigma = 1/p. Then

    |u|_p = \frac{1}{p^{\mathrm{ord}_p(u)}}.

    In other words, the higher power of p divides you, the smaller you are.

    Note that this norm can be restricted to the rational integers {\mathbb Z} contained in {\mathbb Z}_p. The ring of integers is not complete under this norm, and therefore we can consider its completion, i.e., the smallest complete normed space containing {\mathbb Z}. Then the standard construction of the completion coincides for the p-adic norm with the construction of p-adic integers as sequences. Specifically, the condition that u_r \equiv u_{r+s} \pmod{p^r} translates into the Cauchy criterion d_p(u_r, u_{r+s}) \to 0 as r\to 0 for sequences.

    In light of this norm, the series notation also starts to make sense. Indeed, the truncated series form a Cauchy sequence, since b_r p^r + b_{r+1} p^{r+1} + \cdots + b_{r+s} p^{r+s} has norm no greater than 1/p^r, which goes to zero as r goes off to infinity. Thus the infinite series we work with converge with respect to the ultrametric p-adic norm.

    Tags:

    Leave a Reply